I received a photo ticket in the mail.  I’ll fight it and probably lose.  (Or I’ll be jailed for contenpt of the contempible court.)  But while thinking about the legal contest, I thought of the above line.  I think I’ll use this line as my opening statement in front of the judge.

My taxi was dispatched to the local gestapo (er police) detachment at 2 AM to pick up a woman the government support thugs were releasing from custody. Why were they letting her out at 2 AM on a cold evening without her confiscated sweater? Well, you tell me how that inhumane treatment protects your civic defense.

The woman wanted to be driven to a low-rent motel were she was staying. Along the way she described how she had been treated while in police incarceration – I’ll spare you the disgusting details. But when we got to the motel, she went to the office to get a spare room key – the police had taken hers for the reason to be told now, and not returned it to her. The asshole cops ransacked her room while they had her in lockup and stole everything of any value.

The media bias tries to project an opinion that crack-addicts, street-hookers, bikers and indigents are the dregs of society. WRONG! The true LOW-LIFE sleaze-balls are politicians, police, corporate executives and f*cking lawyers.

At the end of this story I didn’t get paid any fare, but then I seldom do when I pick up a person that the police have assaulted and robbed. I drove her around until she found a place where she could be warm.

F*CK the police! They are all cowardly asshole thieves with yellow stripes down their pant legs instead of their tunic backs. I don’t want official thugs like that committing their crimes against humanity – in my protection and I have not authorized the criminal Nazi government to condone torture and oppression purportedly on all of our behalf – BS.

Or is there more? What drug addicted cop wants their supplier out of business?

“four little, five little, six little drug users.” Supposedly, we the people are granting these police officers with authority and equipping them with guns. It should be simple due diligence to ensure the police are not substance impaired when they work. But I said ‘supposedly’ because the police are NOT employed by the people. The police are weapons aimed at keeping the people under the political tyranny of the law power freaks. And for that main task, the political masters want the guard dogs to be as aggressive as possible. So blind eyes are turned and police are NOT subject to random [AND INDEPENDENT] drug testing.

You CAN Hypnotize!

Click Her or Here!

Because we people have neglected to monitor our civil liberties, we are in a substance abusing police state.

“seven little, eight little, nine little substance abusers and ten little corrupt cops.” The ‘rule-of-law’ has long since become the ‘rule-of-money-and-power’. The police have their attentions focused on the highways and intersections where the minor but major revenue generating infractions are. While the mind altering substance problem grows ever larger with police officers standing in cue to get the drugs.

I drive a taxi and at about 4:30 on Saturday afternoon, I was tired from a long shift and heading home.  As I was about to round a corner, a City Bylaw Enforcement Officer turned onto the street.  He observed me doing an action which appeared to be lighting a cigarette.  -Screech!- His brakes matched the siren that was likely wailing in his mind – ‘LAW BREAKER! LAW BREAKER!’ He stabbed a pointing finger at me!  So I stopped and rolled down my window.

“If I EVER see you smoking again,” the Peace Officer’s  tone of voice was as an Army Drill Sergeant hopped up on Meth-Amphetimine, “I’ll tow your F*CKING cab!”

This was not an immanent shoot-out situation, my demeanor was calm and at the very worst, this was a situation involving a (largely unpopular but also minor) city smoking bylaw.  The decidedly hostile peace officer was blowing it completely out of proportion.  But presumably part of his annoyance came because doing an investigation and perhaps writing a citation, would have kept him from his next destination, which was obviously the nearby coffee shop.

I wrote a note to city council about the incident – not that it is likely to accomplish any purpose, but to put me onto a hit list.  And I’m writing about it here to express my belief that people should one day stand up against this police abuse that can range from gross over-reaction to minor things, and up to a gang of thug cops murdering an innocent, unarmed man in the Vancouver airport terminal.

Some very SICK people in uniform are the CAUSE of many societal problems, including the rapidly diminishing public respect for police.  And nothing official is done about it because law has granted itself immunity from prosecution, and even from unbiased investigation.

Shame on us as supposedly civilized people, for allowing ourselves to become ruled by such a corrupt, greedy, domineering, and evil system.  WOW! That sounded harsh, but consider the minor incident that I started this post by describing.

It happened in the late afternoon of a Saturday and the peace officer has doubtlessly just started his 4-midnight weekend shift.  He expects (and as the bully he is, he eagerly anticipates) some good fights with intoxicated people.  In preparation for his shift, he has already loaded up on shots of testosterone and whatever other chemicals the police use to boost their aggressiveness.

Given the pharmacopia of hormone unbalancing drugs brewing inside the peace officer, I can well imagine his inner turmoil.  If he was to be late for his coffee, he wanted to be able to at least pummel me for my cavalier attitude towards his precious bylaw, to which he owes his very existence.  But by being peaceful and affable, I’m not allowing him to escalate the encounter up to the excessively violent that he wants – so that pisses him off even worse – hence the yelling, foul-mouth cursing and threat of the maximum fiscal censure of tow-charge+fine+whatever-else.  Is this is beneficial for our society over the long haul?

We as citizens should demand that a body that is entirely separate from policing and law, be empowered to investigate and issue binding directives to policing and law: IE to have manditory drug testing for the police.  And we should do it soon!  Consider this, the Nazi SS had an unfettered and excessively violent hand, BEFORE the death camps came about.  Those who don’t learn from the lessons of history are doomed to repete them.

Instead, I use my solitary driving time to work on spreadsheets, write blog posts, ot to compose articles.  Then when I have a paying fare in my taxi, I can do texting and email while carrying on a conversation with the person in the back seat.  If you REALLY want to do something positive to improve road safety, you should buy one of the digital products I offer on my sites.  Then I can retire from cab driving. 

Conversational Hypnosis Works

Why do I occupy my driving time with distracting pursuits? I never did – until it became illegal. Now I do it because – well – F*ck Law! F*ck Law right up its over-stretched a**hole. Law may have been slightly better than rule by kings, but law is NOT the right way to effectively manage a society of supposedly free people. And I’ll flagrantly break any law — as long as I can do so without harming a living person.

[NOTE: Law's 'over-stretched' a**hole comes from having lawyers, politicians and police pumping law from behind for so much cash that law is now too butt-raped to do the job.]

I talk to many different people, from all strata of society and the discussions regarding the H1N1 flu highlights one thing – NOBODY believes the mass media.  That’s what you get when the media is just a tentacle of big business and a hand puppet of the government.  Is the H1N1 a credible threat to public health?  Or is it really just a money making scam the vaccine producing cartel is running?  One can’t believe what the government has to say either because the political parties are just items in big business inventory.

Big business is committing heinous crimes against humanity BUT their media propaganda arm keeps only the one viewpoint in the public’s duped eyes.  “Yes, big business is inexorably making our environment unfit to sustain human life BUT It has to do that to reduce the cost of producing crap that doesn’t doesn’t last – er – and keep people employed and making enough money to continue being stupid consumers.

People are lining up for this precious new H1N1 vaccine.  Why?  Because they don’t trust either media, government or big business.  Because if this H1N1 is actually a virulent strain manufactured BY the big corporate pharacuticals to kill off those who are not properly propagandized, then people would rather be duped live sheep, than independant dead people.

A guy tells me he was recently shaken down by the local police.  When frisked, the police found he had a bag of weed and $300.  “Was I ever lucky!”  He said.  “The police confiscated both and let me off with a non-written warning.”  His personal ‘luck’ is society’s misfortune because an obvious reason for a non-written warning was to allow the corrupt officers to keep the money and the weed without leaving an evidence trail.

Conversational Hypnosis

The view from the street level is that the police are the very worst of criminals and those street people have the direct view of the criminal activities the police engage in.  The rest of society turns a blind eye and feel sorry for those ‘brave officers’ who put their lives on the line to ‘serve and protect’.  That is noble sentiment but often utterly untrue: police are ‘self-serving’ whatever they can get and ‘protecting’ their own interests by eliminating a potential witness of their nefarious activities.

The murdered street-hooker had been in the area for a number of years.  Yet her criminal record was likely fairly clean, because she provided the police with some sexual favors and she resold confiscated drugs for them.  Is it possible that she made the fatal mistake of asking for something in return?  Or perhaps she may have said she would tell of her dealings with police and maybe that provoked her death?

Of course I have no proof or direct knowledge to make an official allegation.  Doing that would only put me onto a police hit list.  Even this post might mark me for harrassment but if we people are ever going to free ourselves from the rule-by-criminals, someone has to take the chance and speak out.

So here is a statement of my firm belief: The murder of the drug-addicted prostitute will go unsolved BECAUSE the most likely culprets were automatically excluded from the list of suspects.  And if the police do ever find someone to charge, it will likely be someone innocent of that, but who the police have  manufactured the evidence to convict.  THAT is the world we live in!  And putting your head in the sand like an ostrich doesn’t help fix it!

Do you choose not to believe in my opinion of who really committed this crime?  Then prove to me that I’m incorrect.  You can’t because the system is designed to fascilitate corruption and police brutality.  And as long as the official thugs have the power to hide their heinous misdeeds in an unmonitored way, then they will continue to prey on society.

In the old-school days, the mafia held the criminal reins but soon enough the drug cartels took prominence.  Those times have changed.  There are new underworld bosses practicing their criminal activities and flouting the public good order and discipline.  Who are these nefarious villains?  The top spot goes to the government by a landslide, supported by their police enforcers.  Happy in their second place spot, the lawyers commit heinous crimes with utter immunity from the government and police.

Criminal Lawyers – The term ‘criminal lawyers’ used to mean ‘lawyers who defended criminals’, just like ‘gay’ used to mean ‘joyful’.  Now ‘criminal lawyers’ means lawyers engaging in criminal activities that the criminal government has declared ‘legal’ and ‘gay’ refers to ‘homosexual orientation’ or ‘lawyers who masturbate while looking at dollar bills’.

Be a ClickBank Pirate

Lawyer-Police Relationship – The best analogy I can draw to describe the lawyer-police relationship is the IRA-Sinn Fein relationship.  The police harass, commit crimes against, and brutalize the people, while the lawyers are the supposedly legal financial arm that supplements these criminal activities.  Lawyers give bribes to the police to encourage marginal, incompetent, and downright fraudulent charges, so that the lawyers can make stacks of money ‘defending’ against them.  The true goal is to attain a police state where crime is a growth industry.

“Smoking in my cab is illegal and the Nazi F**king Police would write me a huge ticket for it.”

“Yah right,” I laugh, “You must smoke about two packs a day in here.”

“I don’t smoke any in here.” He protested. “The f**king Nazi law says I have to have this non-smoking sticker on my window or I can’t get a f**king taxi permit. So instead of sitting inside my cab and blowing my smoke out the window, I stand outside smoking and I blow all my smoke back into the cab through a cracked open window. That way I’m not breaking the Nazi’s f**king law but I’m giving the non-smokers who elected the f**king Nazi government a good strong whiff of my anti-Nazi opinion. Smokers that get into my cab appreciate my allowing them to light-up as long as they pay the smoking fine if we get one.”

Click Here To Kick The Smoking Habit

This cab driver makes some very good points. All taxi cabs here are forced by law to have a non-smoking sticker, yet some cab drivers DO smoke, whether inside or outside as my friend does. So instead of protecting non-smokers from smoke, the law just gives a false impression of all cabs being ‘non-smoking’ ones.  A practical way to protect non-smokers would be to forbid a cab from having a ‘non-smoking’ sticker on a vehicle where the driver does smoke. Conversely, it would also allow a smoker to choose a smoking cab if that is what they want.  But that common sense approach doesn’t net the greedy government any extra ticket revenue and we all know that it’s all ONLY about the money anyways.

My friend called it a f**king Nazi law, but in fact it is a STUPID f**king Nazi law.

No More Red Light Districts

Global warming is an issue for newspapers but it’s obviously not a priority around a city council’s chamber.  I recently had the Mayor of my city in my taxi.  I was driving him from the airport after his most recent boondoggle at the taxpayer’s expense.  We were traveling on a particular road where the lights are NOT timed to facilitate the traffic flow: when you hit one red light, you get all the red lights.

“You know,” I said, “that a person who safely proceeds through a red light is doing something pro-active to combat global warming, but the city maximizes every car’s carbon footprint by making us idle at every single intersection.”

“I would like to disagree,” he replied with political vagueness, “but this particular stretch of road is the province’s responsibility” (I’m in Canada, you could replace ‘province’ with ‘state’).

“Avast Matey!” The ClickBank Pirate says “You’ll amass a vast sum.”

“Yet if I had the Premier in my car,” I retorted (if you’re an American, you can think ‘Governor’ in lieu of ‘Premier’), “He would say that each avenue or street crossing this road belongs to the municipality.  So you two have a nice little jurisdictional dispute so that neither of you has to spend the money on having the red lights timed to facilitate a good traffic flow.  But I’ll bet you have it figured out right to the nickle which grasping, greedy government gets the revenue from the red light cameras.”

Is this what we put these clowns in office for?  This type of nonsense is WHY we have a problem with global warming.  Multiply each red light in the politically retarded western world by the amount of cars that must needlessly break for red lights, idle and then speed up afterward – only to repeat the gas burning process one or two blocks later at the next red light.  The total equals a carbon footprint that is MUCH larger than necessary.  But the city or red lights needs to annoy drivers with a long string of red lights, so they will run one out of frustration and provide the greedy government with ticket money.

ClickBank Pirate 4 the Loot

When there is no opposing traffic, then the red light ticket is NOT a safety issue: it is purely greed AND the law’s pathetic desire to keep us as slaves to it.  I have much more to say on the subject of red lights and greedy governments but I’ll save it for another red light and greedy government post.